There always seems to be one main idea that I get from a good book, the idea that will stick in my mind and keep inspiring me. I hear from other people that this is quite common and perhaps this is the reason why good books should be read many times over and over again – to grasp other ideas too.
After I have several times enjoyed Ken Robinson’s brilliant lecture on our present educations systems, I read his book The Element and a short episode he describes there has been on my mind ever since. Robinson describes how he approached an extremely talented keyboard player after a gig in a club, to tell him how much he enjoyed his music and how he would love to be able to play keyboards that well.
“No, you wouldn’t,” the musician responded.
Robinson insisted that he actually really would love to play keyboards.
The musician replied: “No, you just like the idea of playing keyboards. If you’d really love to play them, you’d be doing it.” He himself practiced three to four hours per day, in addition to performing. That made him a good musician, nothing else.
This clear example totally kicked me out of my socks. It is so simple and clear: great musicians are great not because they sit in their armchairs, daydreaming about music, but because they practice all the time. Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers claims the magic number is 10.000 hours. This amount of hours of practice turns a mere practitioner into a master, an artist, an expert… Now, to be honest, I don’t think there’s anything I have done for 10.000 hours. Except for breathing.
But still I hear myself saying so many times: “I would really like to play guitar well. Or piano.” No, in fact I wouldn’t! If I really wanted that, I would be playing days and nights and become a great musician in practically no time. “Oh, I would really like to run a full marathon, but, you see, I just don’t have time to train regularly…” Bullshit, if I really wanted to, there would be no way of stopping me and my intention. But I just like the idea of me, a great marathon man, sadly unable to train.
When I worked as a psychotherapist, many years ago, with some world class sportists, it was rather obvious, hearing their stories, what made them sticking out from their national teams. They were far more determined. When their mates were whining and hoping the training to end, they begged the coach to prolong the training, to do more, to practice more…
Also, when working with pretty vast number of people, either when running workshops and trainings or when coaching individuals, I keep noticing there appear to be two main approaches to life, in this regards, that we people take:
- the victim approach: you complain over the circumstances, scream on the passenger’s seat, whine and cry.
- the explorer approach: you research, walk, you fall and you get up, again and again, you sweat and you wipe your forehead and continue running, you try this way and if it doesn’t work, well, you have learned something and you try the other way…
The first is about seeking safety and evidence that nothing can be done, the second is about boldly stepping into the unknown.
The first is about seeking less problems, the second is about seeking more skills.
Yes, it comes down to whether to evolve or whether to not evolve from the stage of a kid writing a wish list to the Father Christmas, on to a stage of a grown up person, making responsible choices and persisting through the uncomfortable parts of the journey.







